Illinois Attorneys: AI Ethics Guidance You Need to Know (2026 Update)
What Illinois Rule 1.6(e), Rule 1.1 Comment 8, ISBA Advisory Opinion 24-01, ABA Opinion 512, and the Illinois Supreme Court's AI policy require of attorneys who use AI tools, with a practical compliance checklist.
Read More →
ABA Model Rule 1.6 in the Age of AI: What "Reasonable Efforts" Means for Legal Tech
What ABA Model Rule 1.6(c) and Formal Opinion 477R mean for AI billing tools: understand where client data goes, who can access it, and whether third-party processing creates privilege waiver risk.
Read More →
Preventing Legal Malpractice Through Better Billing Practices
Every managing partner dreads the call: a former client has filed a bar complaint, and at its core lies a billing dispute that metastasized into allegations of professional misconduct. What began as a disagreement over hours billed has transformed in...
Read More →
AI-Powered Legal Billing: Ethical Obligations and Best Practices for Automated Time Capture
Navigating the intersection of artificial intelligence, professional responsibility, and client trust in modern legal practice...
Read More →
Attorney-Client Privilege in the Age of Legal Tech: What Every Lawyer Must Know
Using cloud storage, AI assistants, and e-discovery platforms doesn't automatically waive privilege—but it creates ethical minefields that have already cost attorneys their careers. A comprehensive analysis of the current legal technology ethics landscape.
Read More →